Contents

front page

Women and post-modernist injustice - by Stella, 29 June 2006

Well, women and girls have been up to their ol' tricks of murder and mayhem again it seems.

But the media don't like to report about it much, except when they have to, like in this story below about a teenage murderess. And even when they must, they try to sing the poor victim song for the sad little females who've lost their way and didn't really mean any harm - except they kill and maim people. And men mostly. But then, they're oh so sorry about it all - yeah, sorry for their plight and the circumstances in which they find themselves. Then the realities of their actions come on home to them and they're sorry and they sob and cry a lot in court and every dim-witted idiot takes pity on them. Oh how those stupid gullible idiots take pity on a weeping woman in court, crying for mercy for herself.

Let me tell you, there's some women and girls who are rotten to the core and they need taking down. They don't need sympathy, they need a wake-up call to begin to understand the realities of what they've done to other people and what they're doing to the world and to world order. They need to understand the pain, shock and horror that they've inflicted on others. But do they?

No, of course they don't. Mostly, it is a moot point, but perhaps at last some justice may have been seen to be done here in this case -

Guardian- UK
Remorseless, cold-blooded girl killer gets 20 years
Judge Richard Hone described Adeyoola [the convicted] as intelligent and manipulative and said it was likely she would not be deemed safe to release at the end of her term, which he set at a minimum of 20 years.

Twenty years!

That sounds like they meant to be serious about the matter. They wanted to teach her a lesson it seems. Twenty years is a long time.

But in those years, after the event, when everyone and the media has forgotten about the case - but not too many years you understand - bleeding hearts clubs driven by feminist "sorry sisters" will push for her early release from prison.

Here's a quote from the UK site "Women In Prison" -

"We think prison is unjustifiable in almost all cases [for women] given that most women prisoners pose little risk to public safety, and [it's] counterproductive in terms of reducing re-offending."

Hmmm.

But clearly Judge Richard Hone, in the case above doesn't agree and he delivered a minimum sentence of twenty years for this teenage girl.

But, in time, the bleeding hearts will move in and get her out after only a few years. And while she's in there, she'll be treated to all the very best that socialist governments can offer a poor female victim in jail - she'll probably come out soon with a university degree in women's studies or in women's law or some other academic women's wank - all at the expense of you, the taxpayer.

Don't believe me?

Just check out this next story -

Sydney Morning Herald
Anu Singh serves 4 years of a 10-year sentence
Anu Singh, 33, killed Joe Cinque, who had never touched drugs, by sedating him with Rohypnol in his coffee and then injecting him with heroin in the Canberra flat they shared. It took him 36 hours to die in their bed, vomiting blood while she watched.

And now she's out, early, working for the government.

Another clever, intelligent and manipulating psychopath.

But injustices like this are happening all the time.

Women today don't do time in jail. They do a feminist training course inside to become "empowered", to return to the world as forgiven fallen angels. In fact, any woman going to jail these days is a definite winner. Free lollies and a university degree. And in their sisters' eyes, they're heroines - especially if they've committed crimes against men or children. The main problem for this teenager in the story above is that she murdered an old woman. Present day judges don't like crimes against women. Had she murdered an old man, she'd most probably have just received a suspended sentence or some community work and counselling.

"Oh no," you say, "that wouldn't happen."

Well let me tell you, it does. Just take a look at this next story -

The Daily Telegraph
Carve-up killer's plea
Australia - A woman who skinned and cooked her de facto husband will plead with a court to overturn her life sentence - because she is a woman.

This creature, clearly an extremely dangerous psychopath of the most vile kind is seeking an appeal against the harshness of her sentence - life in prison - because, wait for it, she's a woman!

She's appealing on the basis that she's from a privileged sex and should not be subjected to the standard laws and sentences made for men. True story!

This appeal is going through the court at this very point in time, and what's the bet she'll win this appeal and will be "rehabilitated" and placed back out into the community in the not too distant future?

If post-modernists want to call this justice, then let me tell you that they haven't got the first idea of what justice is. And just like my good friend Angry Harry keeps saying that whilst these absurd injustices continue to outrage good citizens, men and women alike, then the day of retribution, the day of reckoning, the day of real justice and the settling up of old scores with those who art in power, will be a very severe and shocking day indeed. And it isn't going to be very far away.

If you do not get upset or outraged about the lack of proper accountability of heinous female criminals of today then you need to have your brain investigated.

Wake up.

When the law, judges and the courts become corrupted and deliver different outcomes to different people purely on the basis of their sex, race, religion or any other discrimination, then that law becomes puerile and it lacks credibility. After that, anarchy, terrorism and insurgency by disgruntled citizens will rise up and that time could be just around the corner - if it's not already here. And that's very scary. And that's what is happening around the world. Tomorrow, it could be in your own front yard if you don't do something about it.

Don't believe me?

Then just check out the next report, it looks like it's already started...

Family violence, mayhem and revolution - by Steph, 29 June 2006

The war against men and their families by liberal Marxists to destroy paternal inheritance continues across the Western world, unabated and escalating. The violence is getting worse. Men are fighting back against decades of outrageous tyranny and injustice for themselves and their children.

Darren Mack, who allegedly murdered his wife and attempted to murder a Family Court judge in the USA stands as a testament to the worsening state of affairs.

Some see Mack's alleged violence and revolutionary behaviour as being endemic of men's reactions to discrimination and unjust treatment by pro-feminist legislation and biased judgements in anti-father courts. They could be correct.

Some are seeing it as being simply violent, uncivilised and criminal. Like Wendy McElroy, who writes here -

Fox News
Fathers rights movement must condemn Darren Mack
Wendy McElroy writes, "Nothing condones the murder of Charla Mack."

And she is correct.

Correct in so far as civilised humanity goes. But what happens to a man and his life when outrageous injustices deprive him of the things he holds most dearly? What is a man to do when he is told that those things that make up his being, psyche and existence are to be taken away from him for no just reason? Should he become compliant and submissive to those people or the state, who would deprive him of what is rightfully his?

Or, as Shakespeare wrote -

"To be, or not to be, that is the question. Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and by opposing end them. To die: to sleep."

Naturally, there's more to the stories of man, Hamlet and Mack than that, but whilst McElroy (and Glenn Sacks) argue for peace and accord and diplomacy on these issues, just how far must each single man endure "the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune" before taking action to "end them"?

How far is far enough and how far is too far?

How noble does a man have to be?

That's a question each man must answer in his own conscience.

Had the allies in WW2 not taken up arms against Hitler's sea of troubles and brought an end to them, how many more troubles would there have been? Would the allies have even survived as civilisations? What would have become of the Jews? What was more noble? War or peace?

The point here is that each man must arrive at his own answers despite the fuzzy appeals of McElroy to embrace tolerance and submit to peaceful persecution. Just how tolerant does any man have to be? How much must a man, or group of men, endure before taking action?

Shakespeare posed the question. You as a man must answer it yourself.

In the meantime, in Australia, in the state of New South Wales, the relentless attack against fathers and traditional families continues with yet more unjust legislation to abuse and disenfranchise men. New laws are about to get going, thanks to the enemy of Australian families - the Australian Labor Party -

News.com.au
Dial-an-AVO replaces court
Australia - Police will be able to take out emergency apprehended violence orders by phone on behalf of terrified victims under the most sweeping reforms to domestic violence legislation in 25 years.

And in the UK too, the war against men and traditional families is waged by the British Labour Party -

Guardian - UK
MPs say judges too soft on domestic violence
UK - MPs have warned judges against sending men convicted of domestic violence on unproven anger management courses and therapeutic programmes instead of jailing them.

And in the USA, more hateful anti-man, anti-father, antifamily legislation is created thanks to Senator Sheila Kuehl, a feminist Democrat -

The American Daily
California spousal rape Bill will harm innocent men
USA - False accusations of violence or abuse are endemic in family law cases. The California Senate and the Assembly Committee on Public Safety recently approved a misguided bill which will make the problem worse by easing the way for spurious spousal rape allegations to be used against fathers.

Yes, the feminists, Marxists, Labour parties, Democrats, Socialists, Communists, Nazis, fascists, they're are hell bent on the destruction of decent family life and their single major enemy is men, because they know that a single man, who'll stand and fight for his rights is their single greatest enemy. And should that man garner support from another man, and yet another man, and another, growing in ever increasing numbers, then they know fully well that they'll not be able to stop them.

That's why they urgently push their crusade to create ever more restrictive and unjust laws and discrimination against men, to brow beat them into submission and servitude. To emasculate them, to take away their self esteem and, they wish, his will to fight.

These very people who choose to dominate the spirit of men also condone and grant carte blanche to women the excuse to plot and murder men, their husbands, using as a defence in court, self defence. They set in place the very laws documented in the reports above which grant women and themselves the opportunity to justify attacks on men. They argue that female accusations of harassment, spousal abuse and violence are justifiable causes to murder, assault, victimise, criminalise and jail men.

But do they grant this defence to men themselves?

No, of course not.

Could it not be argued that Darren Mack himself might possibly have been a victim of an aggressive and abusive wife and that he was a victim of an unjust and corrupt court? A man under severe and extreme attack of this sort could easily argue self defence, justifiable homicide and in the best interests of his children.

Why is it that the public at large will tolerate the injustices done to a man by a woman and the state, yet they refuse to permit that man the same tolerance? The tolerance for a man to fight for all that he has worked for and believed in, to fight for life, family and property.

Was Darren Mack fighting in self defence?

Will more men take up arms as Mack is alleged to have done, in self defence, to end their sea of troubles by opposition?

Judging by history, chances are they will.

Mr Mack might be just the beginning.

Another loss for feminism - by Andrea, 29 June 2006

What's this?

A win for you filthy men?

The Advertiser
Single mothers lose out as dads pay less
Australia - About 10,600 fathers earning more than A$104,000 a year will have child support obligations cut from July 1, forcing their former partners to raise their children with up to A$11,000 less each year.

What kind of government would do this to us poor little rich divorced women? We divorced you dopey men so we could all marry the state and "have it all" as promised by successive feminist Marxist governments and now the state's ratting on the deal and leaving us women in the lurch. It just isn't fair to take away a manipulating woman's money - we've all connived and cheated very hard to steal that money from you men, just like they told us. Now we're being dumped. This isn't fair at all.

Oh no, victims again!

Vhat's mit das dumkopfs in Spain? - by Helga, 29 June 2006

Volks eberyvhere are gettin' offended mit sumpin' or udder. Now eberybody's not laughin' anymore. See? Das ist vhat ger-happens vhen socialists taken oben das gumint. Eberybody not happy.

The Australian
Spanish dictionary offends minorities
Barcelona - Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, feminists and even people from Galicia are up in arms over the latest edition of the authoritative dictionary of the Spanish language, claiming it promotes prejudice and racism.

Hardcore ads - by Miranda, 29 June 2006

This is a bit naughty, but I bet it sells lots of men's workwear. I wonder where they run these ads? Surely they wouldn't let them run on TV.

Warning - this is NOT worksafe!

The Huffington Post
Scruffs' Hardcore ads

Flash movie ads of men in (and out of) rough and tough Scruffs' work clothes, assisted by some very obliging and friendly young women. Have a laugh...

Women think it's ok to beat up on men - by Stella, 19 June 2006

Here's a survey that says it all, about Western women's attitudes to their husbands. They think it's okay to bash the crap out of them.

BBC
Survey finds approval of male abuse
More than half of women questioned at a Glasgow university said they approved of wives hitting their husbands.

Well, I don't think there's any surprises here other than the fact that the researchers think that women need to start to put a check on their violence. Like where have these academic idiots been for the last thousand years?

Of course women are domestically aggressive and violent.

And the world needs to hear about it and the women need to be put into their place.

But the silly researchers are acting very surprised by their findings.

I don't think it comes as any surprise to you chaps.

What these nasty violent women need is a couple of months down at our Kitten Institute's anger management course for women and girls. There, they'll feel the sting of the lash. They'll suffer humiliation and learn submission and learn to respect their menfolk and families. We'll give them a sense of humility and love of their fellow man they'll never forget.

But you see this is what happens when you let stupid women run about with the feminist notion that they're superior to men. Of course they're not and they've got absolutely no idea of how to handle the power that post-modernist governments have given them. They simply go on a rampage of unbridled aggression, pushing and shoving their uncivilised bulk into any thing or anybody they like.

All they ever think about is their own selfish existence and how to achieve their own goals of greed - and they don't care who they have to run roughshod over to get it.

But at least the truth is beginning to get into the mainstream media and that's a breath of fresh air in the alleged epidemic of family violence.

Oh, shocking... - by Andrea, 19 June 2006

Just take a look at this...

Asia Times
India's new outsourcing business - wombs
Reproductive tourism - a new twist to medical tourism - is booming in India. Western couples seeking babies are going there to rent wombs. India is a natural center for the trade. It has good yet inexpensive health care, favorable laws, and English-speaking doctors. It adds a new dimension to India's famous outsourcing business.

Treating women like they're just baby incubators instead of the superior Goddesses that we really are.

Outrageous.

This, of course, has only come about through poor Indian women being disgustingly oppressed by their loathsome husbands and their foul patriarchy. It has absolutely nothing to do with feminism, women's independence, women's love for financial security or our love of consumerism. Oh no.

It has absolutely nothing to do with the Marxist overthrow of religious decency and morality, freeing women to do whatever they want and when they want. No way. Clearly these poor women are innocent victims of all you dirty men out there. Only you dirty men and oppressive husbands would ever force a good woman into doing this sort of thing - as pointed out in the article.

Hmmm. Mind you, the money these women make sounds quite lucrative, and it's only 9 months. Hmm. I might give this a little more thought. Becoming a professional womb - why not?

Here's a business opportunity that men can't control with their glass ceiling. This could be a serious chapter in women's liberation. Maybe I could enlist a swag of silly young Indian girls and hire their wombs out for profit. Hmm. Perhaps I could corner the world womb market.

Just think, like the Hilton motel chain, I could sell "Andrea's Wombs" with 24/7 womb service. And yes, with ultrasound technology, I even can advertise "wombs with a view".

I like this - an all woman business, no men, all feminists and surrounded by gorgeous young girls simply oozing with oestrogen. Ah, feminist heaven. And making money out of them at the same time. Just think of how much power I'd have..

Now if only I can make those young Indian peasant girls stop thinking about stupid husbands and family and join up with me and the feminist movement. It shouldn't be hard. Millions of educated Western women bought the bulsh' of feminism. These Asian women ought to be a pushover.

Now, how do I book a ticket to India...

Men, steer clear of vengeful women - by Steph, 19 June 2006

Here's a tragic case of men who got sucked into a spurned woman's private fight and then became the victims.

Gazette.com
Woman sentenced for role in death
The woman who "put into motion" the fighting that led to the death of John Knott pleaded guilty Thursday to menacing and assault as part of a plea agreement.

It happens all the time. Decent men, thinking they're doing the right thing through a false sense of chivalry and getting sucked into doing illegal, aggressive and antisocial things to please or defend some woman in a jam. Really dumb!

But it's been going on for ages. You'd think that men would have learnt by now. But it seems they haven't.

Just look at this...

"Padilla [the woman in trouble of her own making] pleaded guilty to felony menacing and misdemeanor assault. As part of the agreement, she received a 90-day work-release sentence, a deferred sentence and four years of probation."

Here's a woman who brought about the death of a man, who, it would seem, was just minding his own business and then she just gets a slap on the wrist - a 90 day work-release sentence.

Talk about injustice.

When are you men ever going to wake up to the sly and cunning ways of women and how they cause men to fight and squabble and kill each other over women's trumpted up and trivial grievances? It's been going on for longer than anyone can remember, but some men still seem to fall headlong into the trap.

Bitch gets 18 years - by Steph, 19 June 2006

Well, here's a story that's not very nice, but it does have a just ending - and about time too.

The State
Ruthless woman sentenced to 18 years
A judge sentenced a Liberian woman to 18 years in prison Thursday after a Richland County jury convicted her of cutting her 3-year-old stepson’s genitals.

Yes indeed, a ruthless woman. At last, courts seem to know how to deal with these creatures, so why is it that in the so-called civilised Western world, women like this, have been literally getting away with murder for so long?

This woman got 18 years jail and rightly so - it's about time sentencing started to send a message to women that they must pay for the miseries they inflict on men and children.

Abuse fear syndrome runs riot - by Helga, 19 June 2006

Das ist das mostest dumkopfhenist thing I've eber heard of.

News.com.au
Parents banned from photographing kids
Parents have been banned from photographing their children at many junior events.

Vhat kind of lunatik parent vould go alongk mit dis stoopid stuff? Talk about paedophilia panik. Are peoples so stoopid dat dey let dis sort of kerfoofled thinkin' rule dier lifes?

Und just vhat laws stop 'em?

Kein!

No laws at all. Just stumm compliance mit das dumkopfs with gerfooffled brains.

Tits put bums in pubs - by Miranda, 19 June 2006

Men go to the pub and wives get upset.

News.com.au
Topless barmaids divide a town
Australia - Topless barmaids in a small NSW country town have sparked community uproar with wives refusing to allow their husbands to go to the pub.

Let me tell you, looking at the photo of the topless barmaid that accompanies this article, I cannot believe that these men can be that desperate for a peek at a bit of breast. Goodness me, it's quite obvious that these men are not used to very much when it comes to appreciating womanly attributes.

Oh well, whatever. If these men want to go to pubs to look at flubber like that, then their wives should shut up and not interfere. And then of course, the wives should make sure they pleasure their men when they come home, so their men will think kindly of them and not stray from the nest.

These are the normal duties of any good wife. Only a bad wife would complain about a husband seeking worldly knowledge of flubbery barmaids and their breasts in his life's quest for manly wisdom and global perspectives.

Goward rejected by party - by Stella, 18 June 2006

Ha-Ha-Ha.

How good is this?

Pru Goward, coming to the end of her reign as Commandant of the Feminists-Hate-Men-Party, better known as the Equal Opportunity Commission, tried to enter politics on a NSW Liberal Party ticket, but was rejected in preselection by the party faithful.

Sydney Morning Herald
Goward's move to politics dashed
Australia - Federal Sex Discrimination Commissioner Pru Goward's plans to enter State Parliament as the Liberal MP for Epping have been scuttled by the electorate's Cherrybrook branch.

You see Pru, that's what happens when you push people around and force them to live unnatural lives based on an ideology of female supremacy and Marxist equality - they don't like it and they end up hating you.

Ha-Ha-Ha.

Having said that, and I'm still laughing, let me tell you that as far as Sex Discrimination Commissioners go, Goward wasn't all that bad. We could have had a lot worse if the Liberal Party hadn't been occupying the government benches. But I do hope she now realises that when one exerts their forceful will and power over people, which they don't like, one day, sooner or later, they'll get you back. Now pardon me, while I continue to enjoy this good news some more...

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha....

Bettina Arndt attacks good men again! - by Stella, 17 June 2006

Well, hi there folks.

It's really good to be back in the new look Kitten News on its first day, and I'd like to say how happy I am to be back in the saddle, but...

I'm NOT in a good mood.

No I am not.

In fact I'm really, really angry.

I'm angry because of this woman - Betttina Arndt.

Oh, how she pretends to be a woman who is on the side of common decency and good men. How she pretends to be an understanding and compassionate ally of men and their woes. But let me tell you, SHE IS NOT!

No way.

She's a traitor to men, children, honesty and above all else, true justice.

Arndt's latest writing reveals her true colours.

Just take a look at this...

Herald Sun
Fraud that hits kids
Some of our men's groups are their own worst enemies. They have many genuine grievances, but their latest campaign does men a huge disservice.

I'll tell you who is doing men a shocking and disgraceful disservice - it is this Bettina Arndt, by writing this rubbish.

She is writing of course about men exercising what I believe to be their right, to discover the truth and scientific evidence about the world around them and how it relates to them. It's man's search for knowledge. Something good men everywhere have been doing since the dawn of civilisation. In this case it's men seeking knowledge about the biological paternity of children who may or may not be theirs.

In her latest diatribe, Arndt reveals her allegiance with the lying whores who deny children the truth about their own lives, their fathers and their true family heritage. And naturally, as usually cried by those trying to hide their own agenda, they claim it's all in the best interests of the child. How on Earth could it ever be argued that living a life based on lies, fraud and deception could ever be in anyone's best interests, let alone those of a child?

Truth in life may hurt and damage, but it also sweeps away corruption and it purifies. It creates solid foundations for a better future. Foundations from which can be built a stronger, cleaner life, of truth with real values and integrity. That's the sort of life that's in the best interests of a child.

Arndt argues that men shouldn't seek truth, because it might hurt kids.

She further argues, using a study by Dr Lyn Turney, that men themselves will be damaged by discovering the truth about the paternity of children of doubtful heritage and that learning this truth will drive them into a state of life long grief. She argues that men's lives are better based on suspicions and doubts. It's better, she says, that men don't find out about their wives' infidelity, fraud and deception. She argues this is really in a man's best interests.

Never seeking the truth, is what Arndt preaches. This she infers will make a man blissfully happy - living in ignorance.

What a lot of "hogwash".

It might make blissful happiness for a filthy, lying and deceiving mother and her feminist-Marxist comrades, but nobody else. Certainly not a deceived husband nor her ill-begotten progeny.

And Arndt bases these views on a pathetic study conducted by a feminist researcher working in one of Australia's most notoriously feminist-left and biased institutions - Swinbourne University.

Not only is the study's researcher, Turney, dubious, but this disgraceful excuse for a study itself has doubtful credentials, being based on just 64 twenty minute telephone interviews.

Now what kind of credible research is that?

And who were the people surveyed?

One might have imagined that they should have been men, but the study lists them as "people". For all we know the opinions - and that's what was surveyed just hearsay and opinions - could have come from women. In fact, if you look closely at this study, the entire thing appears very dodgy.

But despite that, Arndt seems to swallow it hook, line and sinker - enough to quote it, "Swinburne University researcher Dr Lyn Turney finds men who discover they are non-bio fathers usually lose all connection with their children," she writes.

Apart from the obviously stupid conclusion of this statement - for how could non-bio fathers lose contact with their children who are not their children? They're somebody else's children, not theirs! So, out of just 64 participants, a conclusion of behaviour is reached and assigned to the entire broader community of men in one massive sweeping statement. That is not good research, it's downright rubbish.

And what about this next paragraph?

Biology can be everything or nothing, concludes Turney. It is a terrible mistake for men's groups to latch on to the biology-is-destiny argument, confusing the trivial act of sperm donor with the heartfelt commitment that comes with being a proper dad.

The trivial act of sperm donor!

Did you read that?

Goodness me folks, I almost choked.

The trivial act of sperm donor - indeed!

There's nothing trivial about a man sowing his sperm for the purpose of the procreation of a new life. There's nothing trivial about it at all. It's the most noble of all expressions a man can demonstrate to a woman that he loves and pronounce it to the world. The sowing of his seed, so he may reap the rewards of his efforts in the form of a new and loving life, which is the same life as his and defines his line of heritage and the future of his patriarchy. This is indeed the greatest act of selflessness a man can perform. There is absolutely nothing trivial about it.

If there's anything at all about procreation that is trivial, it's the trivial part played by the woman acting as the passive baby bag in which the man's child grows into fruition. A trivial role where the woman lays around on her back for most of the time from the beginning to the end. From conception to delivery. Talk about trivial.

And what's this bit about being "a proper dad"?

What does Arndt think a proper dad is?

Some compliant self sacrificing dork, enslaving himself to a filthy adulterous liar of a woman for the sole purpose of being her support and being a surrogate father to her illegitimate brats?

Arndt displays the most shocking insights to her genuine feminist self in this article and her true attitudes towards men.

For Arndt to have written such disgraceful and horrible stuff, it reveals that she holds nothing in her heart for the true value of marriage, a man's love of family, a man's love of his children, a man's love and respect of himself, his respect for others, nor his personal sense of purpose, nor his own personal values of himself.

It reveals at best an ignorant misunderstanding of the values that a man holds to be truth, and at worst it reveals a woman who comes with many faces and has no respect for the meaning of being a man and all that it entails. She has absolutely no idea at all - and no respect for men.

Readers, I ask you to evaluate the facts of her article and form your own opinion about this woman.

I know what I think and by crikey, I'm not about to change my mind tomorrow - there's been far too much evidence pushed into my face recently to believe that this Bettina Arndt is the friend of man.

Anyway folks, it's good to be back and back in the fight.

See you later.

Men more nicer than women - by Helga, 17 June 2006

Ja, vell, I could have told you that, but now some Canadians have come up mit proof about it. Ja, Nice men. Trouble is, some men ist sometimes too nice for their own goods. They let nasty peoples walk all over them. You nice men had better look out. Maybe even stop being so nice sometimes und start fighting back before it all getting too late.

The Globe and Mail
Men more tolerant than women
A Canadian poll indicates men are much more tolerant than women on most sex and morality issues.

More women get lenient sentences - by Steph, 17 June 2006

Outrageous. Just look at these dreadfully lenient sentences that are being handed down from the benches of these stupid, feminised, pussy-whipped judges...

The Daily Telegram
Minimum 3 years for attack on husband's penis
A Lenawee County Sheriff's Department report said a razor-edged paint scrapper was used to slash his penis in what Cheryl Ruple claimed was self defense. The judge handed down a 3 to 10-year sentence.

Disgusting! Self defense? What a load of nonsense. She'll probably only do about 18 months, but you'll never get to hear about that.

Asbury Park Press
Minimum 2 and a half years for killing son
A woman whose son died in the hospital after she kicked him in a drunken fury has been sentenced to three years in prison.

I suppose she sobbed a lot and said she was sorry. And of course that probably wasn't a lie. She probably felt really sorry - for herself! What sort of message does this send to mothers about the life value of children?

Boston.com
Minimum 3 and a half years for killing boyfriend
Judge Carol Conboy imposed the 3 1/2-to-7-year sentence requested by the prosecution, but said one year of the minimum sentence will be suspended."

Naturally the woman argued the stabbing was in self-defense - but it was only a man she murdered, so why would the woman judge care? And who'd argue the case for the deceased anyway? Nobody of course.

And you might also notice how tiny these reports are. Almost hidden away and definitely not important. Killing men and boys is a very insignificant matter these days. Not worthy of frontpage treatment or in depth reporting in the mainstream media.

You filthy men had better look out - by Andrea, 17 June 2006

Ah yes, isn't this wonderful stuff?

Sydney Morning Herald
Premier pledges to get tough on family violence
Australia - Premier Morris Iemma yesterday declared war on domestic violence and gave a personal pledge to find new solutions.

The good ol' Australian Labor Party. They're just so wonderfully supportive of us poor little innocent feminist victims. They just love sucking up to us and attacking you silly men. And look at this - a new solution, he says. It's probably going to be along the lines of Hitler's final solution. So if you men don't do exactly what we say, then all we have to do is just hint at an allegation of violence and it'll be off to a sticky end for you. And all thanks to our lovely friends in the Labor Party, police, and the courts.

Ha! You men are so dumb.

You haven't even got the guts to do a thing about it.

Just a pack of pork chops waiting to be butchered.

Another woman having sex with kids - by Steph, 17 June 2006

Gadzooks!

Everyday, more and more women are being revealed as paedophiles. They're out of control. It's getting to be a daily occurrence.

NBC2
Woman accused of molesting, videotaping five-year-old
A Golden Gate Estates woman has been accused of molesting a five-year-old boy and videotaping the abuse. Collier County deputies say she is proof that anyone can be a sexual predator.

Yep! And they're correct. All that nonsense about only men being the perpetrators of evil is just that, nonsense. I wonder what those feminist bitch types will say about this?

Do you know what they'll say?

Have a think.

They'll say it wasn't her fault. They'll say a man made her do it. They'll blame it on some man and say he did the same thing to her when she was a child. They'll come up with any lie, any rubbish, any old thing at all so they don't have to face the reality of their own demons and responsibilities and to get out of being held accountable.

Men's activism in Swaziland - by Helga, 17 June 2006

Das men In Swaziland art gettin' real, real active real schnell. Guten, guten. But den, dis report from das United Nations scumbaggens ist written from der point of view of das bitches.

All Africa
Uproar as gender pendulum swings
"There is a double standard - violence against women gets all the headlines; violence against men is treated as a not serious thing, because SWAGAA has not condemned these acts," said Julius Malambe, one of the men who delivered a petition to the action group's offices.

Ja! Dis ist guten news to see, folks. Men all oben de vorld are joining de fight against feminist-Nazi oppression. Pretty soon ve'll be haben those femi-Nazi-schwinhunds back in der filthy sewers from vhence they came from.

All us guten men und frauleins ist going to vin der sex-var, you betcha fellas. Just you vait und see. Vun day, ve vin!

Vindictive girl spreads false rumours - by Stella, 17 June 2006

This is shocking!

A young girl, hell-bent on revenge, spread rumours about her ex-boyfriend to such a degree that it inspired stupid gullible young men to go on a vigilante attack.

The Age
Jail for teen's kerosene attacker
A man who doused a teenager with kerosene and set him alight in a premeditated attack spurred on by false rumours will spend at least 2½ years behind bars.

One poor young man is destroyed for life and others are shattered, all because some silly bitch flapped off her mouth about her filthy imagination. Young men wounded for life, but what about her? What happened to her?

Nothing of course. Her life goes on just like normal.

If there's anything to be gained from this disgraceful story it is this - MEN, STOP LISTENING TO THE FILTHY LIES OF SPURNED WOMEN. They make up the most horrible and twisted stories of hate to incite violence between men for their own purposes - even world war.

Now here's a sweet Kitten for you - by Miranda, 17 June 2006

Jenya. A real cutie who's got it all.

Warning - this is NOT worksafe!

But what a gorgeous girl! And she's happy in her rightful place too, the kitchen.

It's just too bad there aren't more good girls out there like her and me for all you good men to all enjoy.

But enjoy this one - they don't get much better than this.

Check it

World Net Daily
Operation Rescue buys abortion clinic
"The pro-life Operation Rescue shut down an abortion clinic in Wichita, Kan., by purchasing the building that housed it and turning the facility into new headquarters and a 'memorial to the pre-born'. "

The Australian
Rules for robots
"Other dilemmas may arrive sooner than we think, says Christensen: 'People are going to be having sex with robots within five years'. "

Guardian - UK
Anger at Indian general's gender slur
"The Indian army has been severely criticised after its vice-chief said the world's third-largest fighting force, which began inducting women officers only in the early 1990s, 'can do without them'. "

Human Events Online
No fathers need apply
USA - "Either the Old and New Testaments are right about marriage and family, or the APA and the NASW are right. There is no middle ground."

The Trumpet
The vanishing "Man of War"
USA - "The gao [Government Accountability Office] found that 62 of 97 female aircraft mechanics could not perform required tasks such as changing aircraft tires and brakes, removing batteries and crew seats, closing drag chute doors, breaking torque on bolts, and lifting heavy stands. Female missile mechanics often lacked the strength and physical confidence to harness and move warheads and to maneuver large pieces of machinery. Some had trouble carrying their own tool boxes."

The Australian
Modern-day Goths and Vandals
"One of Britain's most senior military strategists has warned that Western civilisation faces a threat on a par with the barbarian invasions that destroyed the Roman empire."

Kitten News is a news review service for men who aren't ashamed to say they've got a pair. It discusses men, women, politics, the sex-war, social issues, governance, law and order and any other bloody thing it likes too. It's run by Maximus and his world famous sexy all-girl cartoon crew and is funded by the Kitten Foundation, a non government organisation dedicated to the remedial training of wayward girls.

Kitten News is about natural male supremacy and the glories of patriarchy. Just your basic sort of stuff.

"Unashamedly objectifying women since 2003"