Contents

magazine

Leslie Cannold's back on her hobby-horse - by Miss Stella, 28 October 2006

Aghh...

This Leslie Cannold gets up my nose something awful folks.

Now, for all you good people overseas, who probably haven't even ever heard of this sad excuse for a woman, let me tell you that she's a sly little piece of work. She pretends to be oh so-o-o-o academic and gender neutral, but she is NOT!

She's a feminist and a dedicated social engineer hell bent on changing society to suit her feminist values - which of course are presented as squeaky-clean, butter-wouldn't-melt-in-the-mouth, respectable academic socialist research rubbish that would have done Joseph Goebbels proud -

"Joseph Goebbels, [Nazi] was known for his zealous and energetic oratory and virulent anti-Semitism."

And let me tell you, this Cannold [feminist] is similar in that she shall be remembered for her zealous and energetic oratory and virulent misandry. Notice the similarity?

Now look here, some more zealous and energetic oratory and virulent misandry coming your way soon -

Cannold.com
University of Sydney - upcoming talk on paternity fraud
"Leslie to talk about paternity fraud to staff, postgraduates and medicos at the Centre for Values, Ethics and Law in Medicine. The event is open to the public."

She's just announced that she's going to give a talk, lecture, seminar, propaganda speech, demonstration of verbal diarrhea or whatever else it could be called, on her very personal favourite topic - paternity fraud.

Now this paternity fraud issue is one of Cannold's favourite hobby-horses. She's been going on about the matter for years now. Naturally she doesn't like women being seen in a poor light and so she writes and preaches, through alleged academic "research" created by her similarly biased cronies in other institutions - who produce data to validate their arguments - that paternity fraud is all a big noise created by "angry" fathers to opt out of paying child support. Naturally she says, there is no fraud at all by women and that those women who have deceived their husbands and kids, are really just poor little innocent victims of circumstance and are even, in some cases, the victims of men's violence and unchecked power. She says that women should be exonerated from blame and that the entire issue is really a nonsense. And of course, she also advocates, wait for it - that men must change their ways. Yep. It's all men's fault, you see?

For the record, here is a sample of her involvement in the matter to date -

June 2003 - "Leslie Cannold (CAPPE - University of Melbourne): .DNA tests, Paternity “Fraud” and Moral Panic About Single Women and Lesbians Forming Families with Donor Sperm'." a seminar in Melbourne for the "Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics", who ever they are.

And, strangely enough, on exactly the same date (4th June) the very next year, exactly the same seminar, again, according to their annual report...

June 2004 - "Leslie Cannold (CAPPE - University of Melbourne): .DNA tests, Paternity “Fraud” and Moral Panic About Single Women and Lesbians Forming Families with Donor Sperm'." a seminar in Melbourne for the "Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics" .

And...

May 2005 - New Matilda.com, Paternity denied: the other side of the story, article.

And...

June 2005 - Sydney Morning Herald, Paternity fraud an urban myth: study, article.

And...

July 2005 - Cannold.com, "Daddy Dearest?" the ethics and politics of "paternity fraud", seminar-event.

And...

November 2005 - The Age, Secrets and lies:"Paternity fraud" implies deceptive women, article.

And...

May 2006 - University of Melbourne, Paternity fraud: sorting out rights from wrongs and who is the "real dad", seminar.

And...

A lot more not specified here, such as radio and TV appearances and possibly research papers not published in either mainstream media or the Internet - all about paternity fraud.

You can't help but notice that the woman seems completely obsessed with the subject. She give seminars about it, she writes articles and reports about it, she gives interviews about it - in fact I'm surprised that she hasn't even written a book about it yet. But give her time.

So what's her angle?

Simply this -

• Paternity fraud isn't really fraud at all but just a natural human condition that catches poor women - victims - out unfairly. You'll notice that she constantly places inverted commas around the words "paternity fraud", suggesting that it's a coined phrase which is jingoistic and an invention. She wants it to be called something else, like "paternal discrepancy", which of course takes away the inference of deception, which of course, is exactly what it IS! Fraudulent deception.

• She wants men to stop considering their biological selves, their natural paternal and patriarchal instincts, and instead replace those attributes with an artificial concept of fathering. She expects men to father any of Tom, Dick or Harry's kids by becoming plug-in dads, who will act like mindless, unemotional droids, providing, protecting and promoting any woman's ill conceived progeny and sacrifice his own personal entity for the good of the woman, the good of society and of course, don't forget the old shame clause, for the good of the children, which aren't even his - she wants men to become "social fathers" not biological fathers. A kind of interchangeable matriarchal slave.

• She also wants to destroy any shred of justice men might still have by law regarding biological paternity and she's hell bent on the destruction of the real meaning of fatherhood in the traditional family.

She calls herself an ethicist. That's what gets up my nose. Let me tell you, I cannot see one thing ethical about this woman, Leslie Cannold and her ways, whatsoever.

But that's just an opinion of mine, you understand.

Alleged victim, alleged rape - by Miss Stella, 19 October 2006

There is something very peculiar going on here. Something is very wrong. There's a lot more to this than is being revealed. There's likely to be either an awful lot of noise about it, very soon - or a great big silence. We wait and see.

News.com.au
Alleged victim wanted rape case dropped
Australia - "The alleged victim of a Sydney gang rape told police she did not want the case to proceed, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (ODPP) said today."

Secret women's business revealed - by Miss Miranda, 19 October 2006

Vagina monologues turn into vagina dialogues.

The Australian
The vagina is making a comeback
"Vaginal orgasms are back in the news. New research is about to be published revealing previously unknown sexual pathways: research that threatens the clitoral orthodoxy that has long dominated debate over female sexual pleasure."

Goodness me, can't some women work out what's really going on down there? This isn't exactly new technology. You'd think they'd know which bits were doing what by now. After all, they have been getting around for a long time.

And then, if these women can't even make up their own minds, how do they ever expect you menfolk to know what to do?

Take my advice men, don't worry about it. Whatever you've been doing, just keep on doing it. It definitely seems to be working. With the world population heading toward the seven billion mark you're all obviously getting something very right.

Suddenly men are mainstream news - by Miss Stella, 15 October 2006

Like, what's going on?

Suddenly we've got no end of "let's be nice to men" articles popping up all over the place. And just in the last couple of weeks too. Is feminism really dying? Are women starting to worry and f-e-e-l sorry for the plight of men? Have those unscrupulous politicians seen the errors or their ways? Have all these lefty media sources been stricken with attacks of guilt and become remorseful and man-friendly?

I don't think so.

And neither did Darren when he wrote the following article for us over 3 years ago, warning us of what he could see was beginning to happen, even back then.

And he was correct -

Kitten News
'Man-loving' feminists unmasked
"There is a new generation of sneaky feminism that is really growing this year [2003]. It doesn’t call itself feminism, in fact sometimes it calls itself anti-feminism, but look closer and you see the same old man-bashing bullsh' re-cycled from the feminist manuals of propaganda. It’s feminism coming through the back door."

Oh yes, so true. And despite the "oh-poor-male" mantle of the recent "let's be nice to men" articles, just as Darren wisely advised, "look closer".

Don't get sucked in.

You're being schmoozed gentlemen, by the Feminazi.

So let's take that closer look that Darren suggests at some of these recent articles.

In Australia, we've been getting the following sorts of articles, about once a week now, in an alternative opinion website called On Line Opinion -

On Line Opinion
‘Dissing’ men: the new gender war
"In a book reporting this research released in September 2006 by Palgrave Macmillan, it is argued that the negative portrayal of men and male identity in contemporary societies is not only a matter of concern for men, but also for women."

Well, that doesn't seem too bad, so what am I making all this fuss about?

But do you see the little excuse tagged onto the end?

"...but also for women."

That's the give-away. That's the tag and signal to make it legitimate and feminist acceptable. That's the code that indicates that what the message this writer is sending is not for the well-being of men, but really for the well-being of women. It covers his arse in case this article goes controversial or pear-shaped.

Now, if you knew the source of this article as I do, the University of Western Sydney - men's studies - and the academics who work there, then you'd have reason to become slightly concerned about the motives of its politics. And oh yeah, look here, the following is stated at the foot of the article -

"This article is based on research findings from a PhD research thesis completed in 2005 through the University of Western Sydney and published in Media & Male Identity: The Making and Remaking of Men."

Ah yes!

There it is. The "remaking of men". You can see it with your own two eyes. It's right in front of your face.

That's what these men's studies in academe are all about.

Men must change their ways, they say.

Same ol' same ol'. It never varies. The leopard never changes its spots and these femi-lefties never change their damn song - social engineering about men having to change their ways - whether you like it or not, whether men want to change their ways or not, it doesn't matter, they still go on flogging the same old dead horse. Talk about dinosaurs.

Furthermore, apart from the article being an unashamed promo for the author's own book, the main title - Media & Male Identity - begins to give us some good clues about why men and masculinity are suddenly becoming so prominently mainstream in the media lately. Something of which I'll make a point of later down the page and mightily impressed you'll be too. At least I hope so.

Anyway, moving right along here, the next thing you know after that previous soft sell article on the woes and miseries of men, the very next week, appears another article on the very same website about - guess what? Yep, that's right, the woes and miseries of men, this time authored by Dr Peter West, an associate of the very same nest of PC vipers from that very same men's department of the very same University of Western Sydney.

There seems to be a pattern emerging here.

Nah, couldn't be. Must be just a coincidence.

Here it is -.

On Line Opinion
Is masculinity really in crisis?
"Has masculinity changed across the western world- and especially in Australia? What are the big issues that men deal with today? And how has life changed for men in the past 60 years or so? "

Wait a minute, there's that word "changed" again. Gosh, another coincidence - or is it just more of that pattern developing?

Before I answer that, you listen up here Dr Peter West, if you'd have been reading my columns in Kitten News over the last 4 years, you wouldn't have even asked that stupid question - of course masculinity isn't in crisis. This often touted so-called crisis is simply a propaganda creation of the feminist-left in an attempt to destroy men's own self image and, they hope, will bring men to their knees and make them conducive to behavioural change. But it hasn't. So why are you asking this tired, old, worn out question again?

One might have expected that a seriously credentialled doctor in the study of psychiatry, as West is, would have had a bit of an inkling about this sort of brainwashing mind-game. But then, maybe academics aren't that smart after all. It really makes you wonder. You'd think that he'd know if masculinity was in crisis or not. But then again, maybe he's just pretending not to know. But he wouldn't do that, would he?

After all, he's a respected and upstanding member of the academic community, so what's his point?

Let's take that closer look.

Ah yes, here it is. Right at the climax of his article.

The steps of how men should change their ways!

Gosh, another coincidence?

Here's what he writes -

"If men are to move forward, they might try doing these [changes] things:

1. Speak up. Women can’t hear what men don’t say.

2. Have some ideas about feminism, and get them out there.

3. Learn to relate more effectively to other men. We have raised boys to be competitive, but it doesn’t always work. Men have to learn the art of compromise.

4. If men can listen, they function more effectively in relationships and at work. We must keep trying hard to be good listeners. Isn’t it hard work!

5. We have to express our feelings for loved ones. We don’t need another generation of emotionally frozen men who won’t hug their kids and partners.

6. Men have to take charge of their own health needs, what they eat, what exercise they do, seeking out doctors that are good for them."

Well, my goodness!

There's enough feminist bulsh' rubbish there for me to write another thousand words in response to it, but I'm not going to. Nope, I'm going to stick to my thread. Except to point out the glaring plagiarism of "Women can’t hear what men don’t say", which of course is the original work and quotation of one Warren Farrell. It's amazing that this cheap swipe is committed by an acclaimed and accredited academic!

But we must get moving along for fear that this report turns into a saga like War and Peace. Yet, we must pace and present the evidence slowly. Bear with me and follow the argument carefully. There's a lot in it..

The next thing to appear, on the very same site, about another week later is more of the same. More coincidence or more pattern emerging?

On Line Opinion
Boys need not be boys forever
" 'Thirty is the new 20,' comes the catchcry. 'Growing old is a state of mind!' How true this is. It seems that the fountain of youth lies in avoiding responsibility. Thus boys have babies and so give birth to the next fatherless generation."

A blame and shame article on boys.

This is written by one Tim Martyn.

From that link, "Tim Martyn [Australian] is currently undertaking a Masters of Science in Development Studies at the London School of Economics".

Now we have an international academic connection. This time the message is more damning of masculinity. This time, the call is lucid. Again, but coincidentally, the call is that men and boys - yep, you guessed it - they must change their ways.

Martyn writes, "Male society needs to reinvent the formal and informal rites of passage. We can’t expect teachers, psychiatrists, social workers and the law to succeed where we have failed."

Interesting. You might notice that not a one of these writers has hinted, nor even mentioned the fact that women, their feminism, Marxism, post-modernist liberal thinking and its subsequent lack of self discipline and personal morality might have even had the slightest, the tiniest, or even the most minuscule influence on the matter of the social ills they speak about and beset the entire western world of today. Nope. They don't mention that at all. The thought that it is these things, which, possibly, might have to change to fix the problems of men, apparently, never even enters their heads. Not a one. Not a one even raises a hint of a doubt.

All they can do is blame and shame men and boys and masculinity and tell you that men must change their ways.

This, despite the facts - heavily documented historical facts in writing and concrete evidence - that over the past 2,000 years (and more) humankind has never had it so good, in terms of health, safety, civilisation, education, wealth, self-determination, hope, faith and charity, and any other thing that you can think of, and all of this was created by men, being men, with their normal, healthy natural masculinity.

The realisation that the ills and social problems they bemoan have only emerged in the last thirty or so years as a direct biproduct of feminist Marxism hasn't even dawned on them.

Does even one of these so-called highly educated men mention that?

No.

Do any of these academics acknowledge that human suffering and injustice has increased tenfold in the last few decades, coincidentally along with feminism and Marxism?

No.

Do any of these writers have any idea of what the heck they're talking about?

Well, you go figure that out for yourself, I don't want to get sued for slander.

Do any of these giants of genius have any idea of who is really the driver and engine of civilisation, invention, creation and justice?

I don't think so. They give no credit to men and masculinity whatsoever. All they do is blame and shame, but under the cover of "oh-poor-male" articles. And then they tell men that they're feeling pain because men haven't changed their ways yet and they're the real cause of all the ills in the world.

Men and boys must now stop being their naturally inspirational selves. They must now start becoming women or homosexuals or metrosexuals or anything else lefty propogandists can spin up, except they must not be masculine men.

Which brings us to more "let's-be-nice-to-men" articles coincidentally popping up all around the world. Let's have a look -

Guardian - UK
Brown vows to combat the gender gap in education
"Gordon Brown last night promised action to avert the prospect of a "wasted generation of boys" and tackle the gender gap in educational achievement."

Oh poor boys. How come nobody saw this or admitted it before? But I'll bet Brown's method of tackling the problem will be through men changing their ways.

And...

Times - UK
My quandary in an all-boys school
"The tyranny of league tables means boys’ schools are turning co-ed — using those high-achieving girls to boost their ranking, while girls’ schools stay single sex, not wanting those pesky lads dragging them down."

Oh poor boys again. This surprisingly coming from a self avowed feminist writer for the Guardian, Janice Turner - "I felt I should apologise for my archaic feminist mindset', she writes in another article. So, how come she's being so man-friendly all of a sudden?

And...

Michigan Tech Lode - USA
Real men do yoga?
"This is a crisis. The supposedly manly lifestyle that we, as a culture, have created is a catalyst for many of the problems in the country today. What happens to young men who grow up with a distorted image of masculinity?"

Oh poor men in crisis again. But more blame and shame. What's going to happen to young men, this mangina puzzles. Ah yes, he discovers, men must change their ways.

And so it goes, on and on and increasingly so.

Just a coincidence or is there a pattern here?

It's almost as if everybody was working from the same script. It's as if there was some international manifesto of how to get men to change their ways. Such a conspiratorial idea would be ridiculous, wouldn't it?

Well as it turns out, NO!.

Now we get to that point about which I told you I'd get to before. Surely if such an instructional specification to make men change their ways existed, then it could be found.

Well, just have a "closer look" at the next link -

(Note - it's a downloadable .doc file. It seems to be virus free, so I'm recommending that you can trust it - at least for the present.)

And note the title - it might explain why men's issues are finding space in the mainstream media - it's about and is titled - "Mainstreaming men".

xyonline.net
Mainstreaming men in gender and development
"There is growing recognition that gender inequality is an issue of concern to women and men alike and that men have a stake in ending gender inequality."

This of course is just the local Australian manifesto and unsurprisingly it's by none other than our own prince of princesses, Michael Flood. But I'm sure he's only regurgitating the global feminist script of "engage men's pain, sympathise with them and get them to change their ways", just as we were warned about by Darren's article over 3 years ago.

Yep, all these writers, coincidentally telling the same story in the space of a few short weeks. It's hard to believe it's just a co-incidence.

Jim Macnamara
Dr Peter West
Tim Martyn
Gordon Brown
Janice Turner
Bob Evans

And they're just the tip of the iceberg, there's thousands more and they're churning out the same message across the globe daily, weekly, monthly and yearly - if the shoe doesn't fit, change the foot - that's what they're saying.

Well, I don't know about you but I think men should stay the same way they have been for the last 2,000 years or so. I think that's natural. I think that's the way of men, boys and natural masculinity. I think men have been an outstanding success. It's only since being engulfed by feminism that all the problems of their social engineering have arisen. It's not men, boys or masculinity that's in crisis, it's feminist-Marxism. And I say, if the shoe doesn't fit, then chuck the stupid thing away and get a new one.

But that still doesn't give us an answer as to where lies the international specification for the "men must change their ways" campaign.

Where is it?

Who is behind this campaign?

I don't know, but I'll tell you this - I've been studying this issue seriously for 4 years now, mostly on a part-time daily basis and I keep searching down the links to find a common core and so far the only place that the links ever keep winding up is...

Wait for it.

Drum roll.

Teh-dah...

The Bernard van Leer Foundation
http://www.bernardvanleer.org/about
"As a private grantmaking foundation, we also believe we have a responsibility to use our freedom to fund work and thought that is bold, innovative and experimental. We are committed to learning lessons from monitoring and evaluating our projects, and to leveraging our impact through publications and advocacy."

Well, just what the heck does that mean?

No, I don't know and your guess is as good as mine. It's about the same standard of rhetorical non-speak that the rest of the entire site indulges in.

So who are these people and why do my searches keep coming back to them?

Where do they get their funding from?

What do they really do?

One things for sure, and it's a bit of a worry, it's obvious that they're seriously committed to -

"The best interests of the child"

Now, what could possibly be wrong with that?

You think about it.

In the meantime, the answers to these questions will have to wait for another day and another article.

Motherly love - by Miss Stephanie, 15 October 2006

Motherly love seems to be a dying thing. At least it seems to be for their poor abused children. Just have a read of these shocking cases of what mothers have done to their kids.

Apart from the stories' gross inhumanity, there are other similarities between the reports. One of the things you'll notice is how little media exposure they get. Almost as if the media organisations didn't really want to report about them at all and even then they report as little as possible and in most cases they try to find some mitigating circumstances to excuse the perpetrator.

But this next article is a refreshing change. One female reporter writes about this very matter and indicates that she's getting sick and tired of criminal mothers getting all the sympathy.

Canadian Children's Rights Council (Globe and Mail)
Some mothers have had enough hugs
"As for Ms. Campione [accused], she may have been depressed, she may have been abused, she may have felt abandoned, she may have been mentally ill. She may need help, punishment, a good lawyer, money. But a hug? My gender has had enough hugs."

And, here's a report about the Campione case referred to above...

National Post - Canada
Mother charged with killing toddlers
" 'That mother needs a hug,' Ms. Lynn said."

She needs a good smack across the mouth if you ask me, to bring her back to her senses and out of her state of self-indulgence. Then after that, she needs to be made an example of to all the other criminal mothers who abuse their precious children. Jail, whipping and public humiliation, or all together would be too good for her. If legislators took children's lives seriously, then they'd have massive sentences for these sorts of frequent crimes. However they don't. You see, children don't vote, especially dead ones, but women do. So it's go easy on women while innocent kids have to take care of themselves. It's lucky for some kids they've got a dad around to protect them.

And, here's another one...

Delcotimes.com
Woman charged with attempted murder of son
"A borough woman was released from a psychiatric unit Thursday and was immediately charged with the attempted murder two weeks ago of her 3-year-old son."

And, another...

All Headline News
Woman charged with killing twin infant sons
"According to a sworn affidavit from police, the woman said she smothered her children in her bed because they were crying. She said she then went back to sleep."

And...

Hardin County News
Mother charged with abandoning newborn
"A 19-year-old woman faces charges that she abandoned her newborn daughter earlier this week in her apartment's laundry hamper."

And...

Kcci.com
Mother charged with trying to sell son for wedding dress
"Police charged 31-year-old Marcy Gant with one felony count of sale of an individual for trying to sell her 4-year-old son."

And...

Sydney Morning Herald
Mother used baby as weapon
"A woman used her four-week-old baby as a weapon in a domestic dispute, swinging the infant through the air and striking her boyfriend with the child."

And all of those are just the major stories from the last week or so. Just imagine how many more cases there have actually been and have gone unreported.

How can those lying politicians and domestic violence advocates accuse men of being the "overwhelming perpetrators" of domestic family violence in the light of these reports?

In fact, in the light of all the sorts of official data and statistics emerging daily, which suggests the exact opposite, why is that not acknowledged? I would venture to say that overwhelmingly, women are by far the most prolific perpetrators of domestic family violence, when child abuse, and children are part of the family, is tallied up into the equation. But of course it is not. Simply because that would expose women to the truth and leftists, academics and politicians, wouldn't want to upset their sisterhood.

And then they have the temerity to say that they always act in the best interests of the child. What a pack of filthy lying scumbags they really are.

Why do you good people put up with them?

Marriage strike biting home - by Miss Stella, 15 October 2006

Yep, all you sensible men out there refusing to tie the knot until there's been just and proper reform of the Family Law Act to give you back your rights as husbands and fathers is having a worrying effect on those previously smug politicians. They're worried that there's not enough little babies being born and so they're going to run out of new young slaves for their empires.

Good.

Keep it up until you can drive the point home.

Until then, get used to seeing the sort of rubbish written in this next article trying to blame, shame and scare you into hitching up with some skank who'll rip you off blind once she's manipulated the sperm out of you, let you set her up in a house and a lifestyle she'd like to become accustomed to - before throwing you into jail on false violence allegations - and finally, getting the divorce and all the goodies that go with it.

Here's an academic medico trying to shock you into fatherhood. He too, I assume is very worried about his future income as a practising obstetrician.

Sydney Morning Herald
Young men told to make babies now
"Male infertility is emerging as a crucial factor for couples battling to have babies, but only a tiny fraction of them realise that men's procreative punch also droops with age."

Notice the snide implication to impotency - droops - in the by-line. Typical demeaning language of feminist-left media reporting.

And here's another one...

The Australian
Age may not weary them, but men too have a use-by date
"If you have a penis you may want to read this when you are alone because it may come as a shock. Men have a body clock, too, and once they pass 40 their sperm starts to lose its mojo."

More humiliating language, this time from a man-hating feminist - Louise Evans - who makes her living from demeaning men on a regular basis. Anyway, she doesn't know what she's talking about. She's only regurgitating the rhetoric of femo-research to undermine men's natural sexual superiority.

Sperm no good at 40?

Just go ask Mr Rupert Murdoch, Mr Mick Jagger, Senior Pablo Picasso (deceased) about the quality of men's sperm in mature men - not a problem, they'll tell you.

Don't you men worry about a thing. If you find the right Kitten, your body will be producing gushers of top quality high grade sperm, at least until you're too old to remember what to do with it.

And here's more blame and shame directed at you good men for not getting into romantic trysts with female staff members.

Times - UK
Nervous men kill off the office romance
"Kim Elsesser, co-author of Glass Partition: Obstacles to Cross-sex Friendships at Work, published in the academic journal Human Relations said: “The unintended consequence of sexual harassment awareness is that women suffer from men’s uncertainty on how to behave."

Nervous men!

Uncertainty!

These femocrats and manginas do like to live in denial don't they? Men are neither nervous nor uncertain, they're just being smart. For a start, who wants to talk to some self deluded thirty-something, up-herself, career princess about romance and sex? No man in his right mind would. She's probably one of the over 40% statistic of women who can't get their rocks off - orgasm - and blames you men for it. She's probably got a liberal arts degree in Wimmyns Studies, (lack of) Communications or (un) Human Relations and couldn't hold a conversation for more than a few seconds without trying to put any man "in his place".

And of course, what man could be bothered chatting-up such rubbish and risking career and employment futures, when he can do perfectly well down at the pub or the local cafe with a real piece of fluff, who'll probably even bend over backwards (or forwards, or kneel down) to please him and give him what he really wants?

And I'll tell you - it isn't romance.

And here's even more femo-clap-trap...

The Australian
It's raining men in 2026
"The good news for Australian women - and the challenge for the men - is that these tables will flip over the next 20 years, based on new research by The Weekend Australian. By 2026, there will be an excess of 60,000 males in the 30- to 39-year-old band, and an extra 38,000 men aged 40 to 49."

Ah yes, a delusional fairytale to appease the angst of anxious spinsters sitting on the shelf frightened to listen to ticking clocks.

But all princesses believe in fairytales, so mightily pleased they'll be to read this article. They probably won't stop to think about just where all these men are going to come from or why more baby boys will be brought by the stork than baby girls. They'll just twitter and giggle about it, chatting around the water cooler, multitasking instead of working and dream about white chiffon and fluffy femo-clouds and wedding dresses.

But they're in for a nasty shock.

What the main writer - George Megalogenis - of this article didn't quite tell them is that the increasing male population in Australia is being imported. Nor did he mention that most of these immigrants are arriving from Asia and in particular, from Western Asia, better known as the Middle East, where the men hold somewhat more traditional attitudes towards, women, housework, motherhood and female morals.

Yep, most of these new chaps follow the religious teachings of Islam and they don't have a lot of time for Karl Marx or feminism or the sisterhood or women in a workplace other than the kitchen. You see George Megalongenis is a dedicated champion and advocate for multiculturalism - funny how the article forgot to mention that.

It'll be very interesting to see how these women get along with wearing their new burqas and the like. I wonder who's going to win? Feminism or Islam? Let me give you a clue - the winner's name isn't likely to start with an F.

Dream on fairytale princesses, dream on.

Tick-tock, tick-tock...

Yikes - dumkopf fraulein parks car - by Miss Helga, 15 October 2006

Vas ist das matter mit das frauleins und das autos?

Ocregister.com
Woman crashes car into school office
"Superintendent Richard Bray was on the phone when a silver Lexus came hurtling through a metal fence and crashed into the northeast wall of his office."

Donner und Blitzen!

How can such vymen get das licence to drive?

Das report in das news says - ya, un-be-lievable - aber du go und check it out -

"She was attempting to park her car in the district parking lot when the car suddenly jumped the curb. Police are investigating."

Vow! Yowser! How can ze fraulein parking das auto get to do dur wundervoll ker-krunchen stunts und ker-krashen down das whole skoool-office, yust by parkin?

Yikes!

Ist ein awesomely remarkable act of female stoopidity.

Oh Ja! Sheese!

Madonna adopts pet boy - by Ms Andrea, 15 October 2006

Ah yes, the joys of feminist empowerment.

Times - UK
Madonna's adoption is challenged by activists
"Madonna's hopes of soon being united with the boy she planned to adopt were fading last night after a human rights group in Malawi began an appeal to stop the child leaving the country."

But this is so sexist. Fancy some patriarchal man-scum interfering with feminist-lesbian icons like Madonna and her right to own her own pet boy. Is there no respect in the world?

Clearly though, the matter is surely procedural. No one would ever dare to stand between Maddona and anything SHE wanted.

Just think, Madonna with her very own pet boy. I'd like to be just like her one day. I can see it now...

Madonna and pet, sitting down while she metrosexualises him and teaches him the subjugation of masculinity. She'll educate him into the ways of being a fourth rate citizen and to be her little boy slave. She'll love it.

They'll probably spend Sunday afternoons flipping through Greer's paedophile book of nude boys, and Maddona can massages her pet's body in the privacy of her own home with lubricants and sensuous lotions. She could do anything she wanted to him and nobody would ever dare say a thing. That's woman power for you. No one challenges a mother - especially a feminist mother like Maddona.

Ah yes, one day I'll have all that too - just as soon as I've finished with you filthy sex-crazed misogynists and taught you who's the boss. You'll see. One day you'll beg for my favours, but I'll just laugh and gleefully thrust my dainty stiletto toes into your sack of crown jewels. One day, oh yes, us feminists will be kings.

But you must excuse me folks, I seem to have become a little damp. I'd better go. Thinks - I might phone up Maureen in NY and we can do some heavy breathing over the webcam. Ah, the joys of post-modernist liberated diversity.

Narkiss - classical European nymph - by Miss Miranda, 15 October 2006

Warning - this is NOT worksafe!

I have no idea where Narkiss originates from, but I can't help but think that she's got a certain Eastern European quality of simple, natural femininity about her.

Presently Eastern European women have that fresh feminine beauty mostly untouched by Western feminism. How long that lasts though, I also have no idea.

In the meantime, enjoy. One day, perhaps all women will return to their natural state and will love, honour and obey their menfolk as is naturally intended.

Kitten News is a news review service for men who aren't ashamed to say they've got a pair. It discusses men, women, politics, the sex-war social issues, governance, law and order and any other bloody thing it likes too. It's run by Maximus and his world famous sexy all-girl cartoon crew and is funded by The Kitten Foundation, a non government organisation dedicated to the remedial training of wayward girls.

Kitten News is about natural male supremacy and the glories of patriarchy. Just your basic sort of stuff.

"Unashamedly objectifying women since 2003"

Check it

Telegraph - UK
Climate chaos? No way!
"The Stern report last week predicted dire economic and social effects of unchecked global warming. In what many will see as a highly controversial polemic, Christopher Monckton disputes the 'facts' of this impending apocalypse and accuses the UN and its scientists of distorting the truth."

Cool Tools 4 Men
Atheism
"The atheists like to claim that the more intelligent you are, the less likely you are to believe in God. Well, whilst it may be easier to convince those of more modest intellectual talents of the more hard to believe aspects of religious dogma, atheists do not have the monopoly on intelligence."

Cool Tools 4 Men
Are forums a waste of time?
"I believe, the men's forums have delayed progress that could have occurred if the same levels of energy had been funneled into creating and linking up many men's websites and blogs." - No argument here, go Darren.

Spero News
The feminization of the American military
"In a tender love song from the late 1970’s, Bob Dylan asked, 'Can you cook and sew and make flowers grow, do you understand my pain?' To the ensuing barrage of feminist criticism, the somewhat shaken but unrepentant song writer replied: yes, women should be free to do whatever they liked, but 'when a man says he’s looking for a good woman, he isn’t looking for an airline pilot'. "

Renew America
UN violence report laced with myths and misandry
"Last week he [Kofi Annan] released his long-awaited report bearing the grand-eloquent title, the Secretary-General's Study on Violence Against Women. Even by United Nations' standards, the report is an embarrassment."

Macleans.ca
Interview with author and therapist Esther Perel
"[T]here are a number of feelings that fuel desire that are not necessarily gentle, positive feelings. Desire can be instigated by small doses of anxiety, the right amount of guilt, the violation of prohibitions, a slight transgression, and an element of aggression, even the desire to conquer. Those feelings, in the right amounts, are powerful aphrodisiacs and they are intrinsic to desire"
(Some rubbish, some good).

Kitten News
'Man-loving' feminists unmasked
"There is a new generation of sneaky feminism that is really growing this year [2003]. It doesn’t call itself feminism, in fact sometimes it calls itself anti-feminism, but look closer and you see the same old man-bashing bullsh' re-cycled from the feminist manuals of propaganda. It’s feminism coming through the back door."

Zombietime.com
Lebanese Red Cross ambulance incident - a hoax
"On the night of July 23, 2006, an Israeli aircraft intentionally fired missiles at and struck two Lebanese Red Cross ambulances performing rescue operations, causing huge explosions that injured everyone inside the vehicles. But there's one problem: It never happened."

Kitten Hall of Fame

Archives

Please note - news links contained on the following archived pages may not have remained active.

August 06
July 06
June 06

Contact

We have been trying to set up a better method of feedback and contact due to a severe attack by email crawlers and an avalanche of spam, but we have been defeated by time. So, here's our contact address should you wish to express your opinions to us -