 |
Mangina judges rape justice
- by Miss Stella, 19 November 2006
|
High Court Justices of Australia sneak up from behind sweet innocent blind justice and deliver a cowardly king-hit. They smooch, grope and drool over her. They pull her knickers down and gang rape her, one by one, penetrating and destroying her humanity, writing an immoral determination before the stunned eyes of the entire world. They reach a unanimous decision argued from a point of law, which has about as much soundness as a vigilante lynch mob with fire in their bellies, mendacity in their hearts and fraud as their virgin heroine, string up an innocent man, falsely accused, for the abject delight and entertainment of the town's women and their corrupt officials. They deliver a decision of sneering public humiliation of all men, all fathers, all paternity and all men's children.
Yes, the High Court of Australia condones paternity fraud -
The Australian
Infidelity approved by High Court
"Wives who cheat on their partners have no legal obligation to disclose their infidelity, the High Court has ruled, declaring such matters 'should be left to the morality of spouses'."
This case has been going on for years now, a bit longer than we've been here on line and we've been waiting patiently for the outcome of this matter and let me say, no one around here was surprised by the High Court decision. We had an inkling that it would be as it was. Clearly, the High Court justices didn't want to open the "Pandora's box", as the Chief Justice of the High Court described it, because it would have created a nightmare for the Family Court and Child Support Agency. But not only for those agencies, but in particular, for Mr John Howard's entire federal government. This case of Liam Magill and his fraudulent ex-wife had massive ramifications for everyone and the outcome had to be seen to shut down any further claims.
This High Court decision is not a case decided on merit, but a political decision decided on what was in the best interests of the federal government, its wallet, Family Law policy, Child Support Agency practicalities and of course, to appease feminists, feminist policy, women across the nation and, more importantly, their future voting patterns.
This entire finding is wracked with mendacity and injustice.
Law, reason, justice or simple common decency played little if any part in these justices arriving at their decision. But they had to present a case to justify their stance. So it was a matter of "fit the law to the case" not "fit the case to the law".
Anyway, it doesn't matter, because men have only just begun to fight this issue and for Liam and Cheryl, this is not the end of their struggle either, but a new beginning. Those of you out there who may think that this is the end of the matter are grossly mistaken.
Immediately following the announcement of the High Court decision, Barry Williams of the Lone Fathers Association, arguably the leading men's rights advocate in Australia, was reported in an article in The Age as saying, "the group would press the Attorney-General to make genetic testing compulsory at birth if there was doubt about paternity."
Well, it seems that Barry is well connected, because just days after he made that statement and the decision was handed down, this story appeared -
News.com.au
DNA test rights proposed for duped dads
"Men would have an automatic right to DNA testing to check that they are the biological parents of their children under a plan being pushed by the Government's back bench."
And, it further reported that, "A spokesman for Attorney-General Philip Ruddock said the Government was 'weighing up its options' on protecting men in Mr Magill's situation."
So, it definitely appears that Mr Barry Williams does indeed have good connections with the Attorney General, and that men's rights are being evaluated by the federal government. Although, if you're as cynical about government statements as I am, you'd not necessarily believe it - right?
Well, later on the same day, another report appeared with a statement alleged to have been made by none less than John Howard, the Prime Minister himself -
News.com.au
Men entitled to DNA paternity tests, says PM
"Prime Minister John Howard said today he would consider law changes to give men paying child support the right to paternity tests."
But wait a minute.
What was that again Mr Howard?
Men paying child support?
Why just them? What about all men?
Why can't all men, everywhere, everyday get an immediate DNA verification that any newborn child is or is not their biological kin? Their paternal progeny?
Such a test in Australia is simple. All parents of newborn babies in Australia are offered a "newborn screening test" for reasons of the baby's health and early detection of specific diseases. This test involves a pinprick in the baby's heel shortly after birth, the taking of a small blood sample and up to 99% of all new parents consent to the test being done. That means that to do a DNA test for paternity immediately after birth is simple. Such a test for paternity is easy. So why isn't it being done?
It should of course be a standard procedure. The young baby is already caused some trauma by the test, but to establish 99% DNA paternal certainty it is an easy test thereafter. It is a simple and inexpensive laboratory test of a blood sample that has already been taken. A blood sample from almost very baby is available, so why not do a DNA paternity test on it as a standard procedure?
It's a simple and not expensive. You men must begin to demand this DNA test as a standard procedure following the birth of every baby. After all, establishing paternity, something that requires a man to dedicate the greater part of his entire life to, fatherhood, should be, and is, easily provable. So why isn't it done?
I'll tell you.
It isn't done to protect those lying adulterous harlots from social embarrassment and facing up to their fraud. It's done so that you, the stupid schmuck, the man, can be duped into paying for a child's lifetime and not place a burden on the community - the government coffers. Yep, you must pay for your filthy wife's mischief whilst the wife and the government holds you responsible for paying for some other man's child.
Until you start making a noise about it, until you demand your rights, demand justice, deceitful and fraudulent women and deceitful and fraudulent politicians are just going to keep putting you in the frame.
You mugs. How gullible and stupid are you?
Well, lots of women and manginas believe that you are just that - stupid and gullible and that you can be shamed into paying for other men's children, for everyone else's best interests of course, except your own.
And oh look, already on the band wagon -
Sydney Morning Herald
The complex case of paternity v fathering
"Women are not the she-devils they are painted as, and the men who pursue "justice" through paternity testing and court action can lose a lot more than they gain. For a start, they usually lose the children they love."
Here it is again. This time from Adele Horin, aged battle-axe of second-wave feminism singing the song of femo-Marxism, that men must be the social slave of the state and serve the women of the matriarchy. The same song as sung by Leslie Cannold, Lyn Turney, and even the alleged "man's best friend and ally" in Australia, Bettina Arndt.
They all say that men's biological connection to children is unimportant, your kids or someone else's, it doesn't matter. What's important they say is that a man should take on the responsibility of "social" father and slave and pay for any slut's kids. Biological paternity, they say, is of no consequence whatsoever to a man and is a load of crock. They say, shut up, get to work slave, pay for the whore's kids, and don't complain - but if you do, then the CSA will come and get you and shove you in jail.
That's their ethics.
How long are you men going to put up with this rubbish?
What are you? Men, slaves or just gutless idiots?
|